Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
>> JeffM wrote:
>>>> Rich Grise wrote:
>>>>> [...]Skype looks pretty interesting
>>>>> [...]they don't have a Slackware package
>>>>> and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
>>>>> Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
>>>>>
>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>> What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
>>>> <duck and run ...>
>>>
>>> Actually, it's the oldest extant distro.
>>>
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:t01sMEAV2jYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions+1993-08+1994-*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux
>>>
>>>
>>> I've wondered what the world would be like
>>> if a big rock had fallen out of the sky and
>>> impacted the Redmond campus during business hours ~April 1, 1995
>>> (before W95 and just before Red Hat's release).
>>
>>
>> Probably IBM would then still be in that biz because there wouldn't
>> have been Senor Gates eating their lunch.
>>
>
> OS/2 2.0 came out in April, 1992. A spectacular technical
> success--multithreaded 32-bit OS, fully object-oriented GUI, a beautiful
> object model (SOM)...I could go on...but a stupid marketing failure. I
> still use OS/2 at least a few times a week, and I still love it.
>
Well, absolutely. I was sure hoping OS/2 would make it but they
blundered so badly in the marketing area that it's hard to believe.
Essentially they could have eaten Microsoft's lunch but instead simply
walked away from the table.
<still shaking head>
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
|
